1080p bluray vs 2160p web reddit. AVC is Bluray or remux again. DTS-HD. Those numbers seem high. The source audio and video are remuxed into a different container, typically mkv. The other functional difference between the 2 is that the 4K to 1080p encode maintained HDR. The grading on the 4K is darker, but the image sharpness is visibly lower than on the standard Blu-ray. ago. ‘Ultra HD’ refers to a category of advanced blu-ray that is higher resolution than standard blu-ray. All x265 -rarbg encodes are encoded from 1080p/2160p (HDR->SDR) REMUX for BluRay releases and AMZN/NF/ATVP WEB for WEB releases. Tombdoc - Poor Man's TIgole, but if you are after Hollywood titles with Hindi audio, Tombdoc is best. The audio, however, has no rival. In this case the x265 means the person reencoded the remux, lowering the Blu-ray you get anywhere from 25-40mbps. But the 2160p blu ray has a higher bit rate. Waiting. If not, stick to 1080p. drtotter. BluRay 2160p REMUX bit rate: 46. Download encode and remux and find out if you can tell the difference. You get the benefit of hdr color with some instances of increased detail, but the compression is overall worse leading to many times when the detail is actually lower than a standard blu ray. In the end, 720p with a higher bitrate will probably result in a slightly better picture than 1080p with a lower bitrate. It's a very big difference. DTS. Audio and Video. 4K is my default. For the digital cinema market, however, 4K means 4096x2160, or 256 pixels wider than UHD. WEB. 7. x265 is an encode using the h265 codec. Yes, 4K streams are heavily compressed. 4K files are also more likely to have HDR which can retain higher quality at smaller file sizes. BluRay should be higher quality. Endgame. Feb 19, 2021 · A 1080p TV has 1920 horizontal pixels and 1080 vertical pixels, while a 4k TV has 3840 horizontal pixels and 2160 vertical. I realize that WEB-DL and Bluray are much better than HDTV but I thought 1080p would still look better on a 1080p screen unless the 1080p rip is truly garbage. 1080p bluray vs 2160p web | 1080p bluray vs 2160p web | 1080p bluray vs 2160p web reddit | difference between 2160p and 1080p | is 2160p better than 1080p | wha Feb 6, 2023 · Differences Between 2160p vs 1080p. Everything is so tight and detailed. Really confused about x264 8bit vs x265 10bit results (With Screenshots) I've been ripping my BD films recently. At the same bit depth, a 4:4:4 1080p stream has the same color resolution as a 4:2:0 4K stream. 38K votes, 770 comments. Not sure about when you get into compression w/ various codecs and whatnot. PS: Bluray AVC is untouched is more better>Remux>x265>Web~Bluray x264 AC3 is audio codec. 1080p remix is usually around 35GB, depends on the 4k movies but a lot of mine are in the 70gb range. TV shows in 1080p or 2160p. 97 fps, 30 fps or 59. The 4K bitrate is always quite low and the picture just doesn't look as good. The Breaking Bad Blu-ray also has DTS-HD MA 5. For the display market, UHD means 3840x2160 (exactly four times HD), and 4K is often used interchangeably to refer to that same resolution. The issue comes into play that the Blu-ray is more stable and will stay at 1080p 100% of the time while streaming will almost never stay 100%. HDR encode would look better if your TV has native HDR support. DO you have a decent home theater with kickass audio? Then the UHD is the winner and it isn't even a contest. The BLUTONiUM 4K WEB-DL is much better it’s double in size and bitrate. Pretty big difference, but whether it's worth it is up to you. Infuse has great Codec support for audio and video and I’ve never needed it to transcode. 94 fps. Cornucopia. It is literally remuxed, not converted. 39 GB, while the same movie in 2160p. Bit rate is probably the "key". I'm divided on TV shows though. This means that they cut out some of the quality in order to decrease the size. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I go with the REMUX option 100% of the I noticed that Sonarr's default "HD - 720p/1080p" profile ranks Bluray-720p and WEB 720p higher than HDTV 1080p. whitet86. "Iron. 1 In more than 90 % cases Bluray are good and they are official version of theatre movies,so undoubtedly Bluray is always preferred. • 4 yr. Most Blu-rays support between 20 to 40 Mb/s, while Web-DL formats are limited between 3 to 8 Mbps. With my server, I don’t go higher than 1080p (I RO have 4K TVs, but I am also concerned with saving space and that the majority of my users use 1080p devices) besides a slightly better image why should I get a 50GB movie over a 10GB 2. Walter - No Idea. So they release it in "fake-interlaced" form. I'd take 1080p/1440p@144Hz over 4k@60Hz any day of the week. 4K Blu-ray is even higher, not sure what the max rate is on there. HEVC. Usually around 15-25 GiB, and with proper audio. they probably used high bitrate to not make the quality even worse, as a web-rip is just a re-encode of an already tighter compressed source. Especially if it's from a good p2p group. Far-Environment-1861. majd75. Up to you if you prefer original quality or smaller file. Audio will be lossy not lossless (will be more noticeable on higher end sound equipment). PS : Bluray better than rest in most of the cases. I have a folder for ‘Movies’ for 720 or 1080 movies. • 7 mo. Bluray remuxes will always be better than of course its a case by case things but I would say most of the time the bluray is better. Is there a video and audio quality difference between remux and x265 or is just some languages cut? Has English audio track. A 4k disc will blow the stream away in average detail and consistency. I can tell you there is a BIG difference in color fidelity and saturation. It will buffer at different qualities to keep the stream going. 2160p. 1080p is the resolution. End of the day its all just data being processed and displayed on your TV. •. IMAX 2160p WEB-DL bit rate: 16. But since you’re pirating anyway, just download them all and compare yourself. The easiest way to tell the difference is by flipping between them on a computer. Because of the blu-ray standard, it can't have 25 fps at 1080p. Remux versions are a 1 for 1 copy minus menus. The iTunes one isn't unwatchable, but yeah I would rather own it physically. The previous BCORE Far from home was around 70gigs, this might be 80. On 4k monitor any 1080p content will look fine, almost as good as on native 1080p monitor due to perfect 1:4 scaling. HDR has more color depth than SDR, but you need a special monitor/tv to display it, otherwise you need special software to transform the HDR into SDR or it will look really bad. I just discovered a whole different type of results when I search “2160p HDR”. Remux is the original file. MrKaon. 3. . 1080p Remux. Bluray could mean a lot of things perhaps a encode or maybe the full disk image you have to check the torrent files to be sure. HDTV is ripped from a TV broadcast, and will often be encoded from 1080i or even 720i. Unless the source has some problems like dirty pixels and banding, and the encoder fixes them, the remux is always best. There are very few blurry or out of focus shots. The file size of those goes from 40 to almost 100 GB. This means the Blu-ray can use more data to represent each frame, resulting in a clearer and more detailed image than the highly compressed 4K video stream. Actual interlaced blurays are 29. The quality is untouched. Blu-ray upscales well on most good 4K TVs due to the much higher bitrate than 1080p streaming. 2. 2019. Oct 2001. Reply. With some of these web-dls coming out at about 25 Mbps, we are approaching 1080p Bluray bitrates, albeit with a different codec. SDR or HDR are color profiles. 1080p. It will likely be in h264 or h265 for the codec. The answer greatly depends on the quality of the stream, quality of your tv, your internet connection, and the quality of the Blu-ray player you are using. But you could in theory run two instances to grab 1080p and 4k content if you have separated libraries. The standard Blu-ray is significantly sharper than the 4K version. Blu-ray discs have the best quality video that you can get in a physical format . It’s obvious that the 2160 panels have a significantly higher number of pixels than the FHD models. MrGhost370. Blu-ray is usually the highest quality actual release with the biggest file size. It is not reencoded compared to the bluray, its the same thing but as an mkv. 2070s will definitely shine with a 1440p/144hz monitor. I recently watched a 2160p x265 movie : Coco. But the options the industry gives us instead are 4:2:0 1080p vs 4:2:2 4K where the latter is clearly superior. I guess it is becoming a thing starting with Venom and Spiderman Homecoming? Looks like just demos but doesn't say anything about Blu-ray. The Remux is the video and audio of the disc packed in a . A webdl is the entire video file as it was streamed via the website. It depends though, Itunes is the ''worst'' WEB-DL, since it always use ~5. Remux movie is 49. Not to mention that most streaming services get the «streaming-sountrack» with compression and absolutely no dynamic range at all. However, I noticed 2 things on this search: none of the 2160p HDR flicks are Remux. There are also a lot of factors to take into account. Find good 4k HDR depending to it's runtime should be around 30GB or you can go for Remux version which usually are over 50GB. 2008. However, what "looks good" is subjective so it's hard to say. but back then before 4k uploads were allowed in youtube, is 1080p bad, nope. Do I go for the 1080p and its higher bitrate and trust the upscaling of the TV/dongle to do its job, or do I go for the web-dl and its "native" resolution? Example: The Truman Show: 1080p Remux - MPEG-4 AVC Video 35825 kbps 1080p / 23. RELEASE: Avengers. MA. 1080p is just a waste of potential and 4k at over 60 fps isn't going to happen with a 2070s. 2160p will only look better because if the bitrate is higher than the 1080p one. HDR web is what you will see with 2160p web streaming download. 000 bitrate for video and 384 bitrate for audio. Or streaming will mask compression artifacts with fake film grain. Well the majority of my Movies are in 1080p, 720p until I get 1080p, My TV Shows between 480p - 576p. g: HD) than a DVD (SD)? which has the better picture quality between the two? the same can be asked if a streaming service offered a film/ show in 4k, HDR, while a standard blu ray TL;DR: Trying to cut file size when encoding TV eps but want file closest to source. . Atmos-FGT SOURCE: Leaked Blu-ray SiZE: 86. 5. 480p>720p>1080p>2160p (4k) Remux is an untouched BluRay. Recently got a NAS, going slighly crazy storing every movie/TV show I can think of. Can Someone ELI5 All The Video Formats (WebDL, Blu-Ray, HDTV, etc. For example, a 2160p. BR Rip's also garbage and are in the 1gb range. If it's a 1080p TV, just stick with 1080p BluRay REMUX (or WEB-DL/WEB if BluRay isn't out). BluRay. It can get confusing because 1080p refers to the number of vertical pixels (1080), but 4k refers to the number of horizontal pixels (3840). If you're are really quality lover then you can download both the rips and compare the quality and make a judgement. This is a sub that aims at bringing data hoarders together to share their passion with like minded people. Next time only download one. However the difference should be discernible, just if you are one to pay attention to the small details a lot. I say on average, but some will only shrink by about 25% and others shrink more than 50%. 97 GB… Netflix's 4K streams are is a good example though, as they decided that 7GB/hour (~15mbps) is the lowest that they can go and still satisfy the average consumer. 1080P only if not available in 4K. The releases I pull through Radarr automatically are 1080p Blu-ray or 2160p with lower bitrate because my main use case is a home based Plex Server with no special encoding hardware. BluRay > WEB. Using five Raspberry Pi 4B's as iSCSI 21 votes, 12 comments. HDR is worth more than just additional bitrate or resolution. Edit: To be a little more clear, this 2160 copy you mention is compressed if it's a smaller file size than a 1080 remux. H265 is 18. 5GB file, and average bitrate of 6972 kbps . Also, consider raw vs encodes, as encodes are trying to maximize file quality irrespective of bitrate by selectively compressing the file. Free-Post Friday! I always choose the REMUX 1080p over a 4K Web-DL. Highest quality source is always a priority/preference. Amazon releases are better then the Itunes, but BluRay stays the best in most cases, they just get released some days after the WEB-DL. x264-FuzerHD. There are usually three color channels, so that makes a bit depth of 24 bits per pixel, which is also the most commonly used bit depth of modern desktop PCs. Remux is Blu-ray converted to a normal video file so the quality is the same as Blu-ray. Web-dl offers reduced picture quality, and the viewers have to compromise on the video output. On QHD monitor 1080p content will always be worse than native, how much worse will depend on the bitrate of the source, bluerays have high bitrate which one is better with sound and video quality ? IMAX Blu-Ray isn’t a thing. Your average bluray is about 35mbps, and some UHD blurays are around 100mbps. This is exactly why discs are always the way to go. Now, you can use a higher bit depth for video encoding, and x264 currently allows up to 10 bits per Blu-ray 1080p: Blu-ray discs offer superior audio quality with surround sound . Now if bandwidth is not a problem, I usually download both and then make a hybrid file myself with dovi_tool. It’s gonna vary from film to film. None of them are interlaced in reality. At least the release with HDR. I have the physical UHDs and an OLED to compare. If it was ripped from a 4K blu ray the quality will be the same as 4K blu ray. On the other hand, Blu-ray offers stunning video quality, hence preferred by quality lovers. When I first started out, I would download 720p YIFY rips which I've been slowly replacing with better quality. WEB-DL will be ripped from iTunes, Amazon prime video or Netflix or similar, the quality isn't bad but it is stream optimized and may use higher compression levels. I have the Blu-ray set and also redeemed the code through iTunes. In terms of filesize for a usual 1080p release: Full bluray > remux > 1080p encode > 720p encode > 1080p WEB-DL > 720p WEB-DL > everything else > YIFY encodes Full bluray includes everything such as the play menu, chapter selection and trailers. Jun 6, 2023 · A 1080p Blu-ray disc typically has a much higher bitrate than a 4K compressed video stream. Then I have a folder for ‘4K’ and even a folder for ‘3D’. Guessing it's just for backwards compatibility reasons, since HDR wasn't around when 1080p blurays started coming out and 4k bluray players can convert from HDR to SDR when needed. So the WEB get more downloads. The difference is huge, even more so if you care about audio and/or have a seperate sound system/soundbar. 32 mbps is enough to look good and you won’t really notice much of a difference. BluRay is from a BluRay disc & WEB is from a streaming platform. While 4K or 2160 monitors are labeled UHD (Ultra HD), the 1080p models are only labeled Full HD. The level of detail is astonishing. 4K Blu-Ray plays video at 2160p (4K) resolution. To me, the real question regarding quality is : if i never seen a "better quality" movie beyond a clean crisp 1080p, then did i enjoy less? if i watch a 1080p youtube vs 4k, is there a difference? yes there is. • 1 yr. WEBDL-2160p & Bluray-2160p & Remux-2160p All in Same Profile. Also if you care about image quality then definitely avoid YTS, the encoding is poor with heavy banding. Problem in Colors between 1080p and 2160p movies. If you are using a quality up scaling player then the Blu-ray will look better than streaming quality 9 times out of 10. A remux is the movie only. They can store and play back on physical discs, allowing for easy access and playback . NTb "WEBRip" (actually WEB-DL) is better quality. 5GB file, and an average bitrate of 4358 kbps. x264 and x265 are not codecs, they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). Most WEB uploads will have a suffix to indicate the source such as Amazon (AMZN), NF (Netflix), DSNP (Disney), etc. Tbh thats not a lot for a 4k bluray (since the bitrate is the same as a bluray) imax nowadays. So, you have a webrip where the source has a bit rate of lets say 5Mbps and then you got the bray with 30Mbps (the numbers are random for the explanation). Blu-ray quality with Dolby Vision. Generally speaking, a 4K HDR stream has the potential to provide a superior viewing experience equal to or greater than a 1080p Blu disc. I agree with you, I’d definitely take blu ray over 4k streaming. If the movie has only a 2K DI, you might check out the 1080p UHD BluRay DoVi/HDR rips by good groups. you can thank BTN staff for the naming confusion and RARBG for continuing it. With the 4K to 1080p HEVC encode, I ended up with a 3. For full length movies, I've settled on getting 4K remuxes, with a single generally being around 55-80 GBs, depending on availability, length, and source. An UHD BluRay is all the files from the entire BluRay Disc (menus and extras included), so the quality is the same as the original copy. It's a very simple process and doesn't take long (though it's sometimes tedious when the frame counts don't match and you have to figure out how many frames to remove or add, but even While disc playback reigns supreme over streaming in terms of picture quality, whether it's 4k disc vs 4k streamiing, HD Vs HD, SD vs SD etc, what if the resolution of the video is higher on a streaming service (E. 55" isn't really considered a large display these days, if that's your worry you'll be fine. Depends on the quality of your TV and your budget. Streaming and physical media can pass the same data. With the 1080p Blu-ray encode, I ended up with a 5. If you rip the web version the most you can take from it is 5Mbps (with the loses it already has from the original content), but if you encode a Dune (2021) is an INSANE 4K Blu-Ray. None is good for your TV. For my 4k I use Infuse on my AppleTV which is hardwired. 1-FGT" I just watched the whole movie twice (both released), on my OLED TV 55" (2,2m from the tv) and I could not spot the difference! I also tried to watch close, like 1 meters from the tv, also tried to pause during explosions and action scenes, and could not spot any bad encoding pixel thingy. You won't really notice the difference between 4k and 1080p at normal distances but HDR is the real deal. The MOMA release isn’t iTunes. its great. mkv file without losing quality but without menus and extras, often just English audio. Member. ), and the Pros and Cons of Each? From what I understand it's better picture quality and processesing right for 4K blu rays? I'm considering starting a blu ray 4K collection (just by buying all movies I would usually stream in the physical 4K blu ray version)but how much better are 4K blu rays over streaming? And what makes them better? The setting is under advanced video settings of plex or just fullscreening VLC. If you're watching it on a TV or nice external monitor, figure out what it supports. The remux will have the best quality because it has the highest bitrate. The stream may have the resolution but on many occasions will lack fine detail that 1080p will have. I started off with x264 8 bit with the following settings: 22RF, VerySlow, Film Tune, 4. 4k blu ray rips will be 60-80gb average, web Generally, 4k blurays are HDR and 1080p blurays are SDR. If the 4K has enough bitrate it could be a better expirience overall, but if it's bitrate starved with numerous artifacts then the 1080p is the better option by far. The encodes you’re used to have a precision of 8 bits (256 levels) per color channel. You might consider adjusting viewing distance. If your TV has HDR support, great, most 4K content these days comes in HDR (at least for BluRay). You can get these with no loss in quality through piracy quite easily. My 1080p rips are around 10GB each. The bitrate of a 4K stream can be compressed below the levels of a 1080p Blu-Ray. Man. 6 Mb/s. Only difference is streaming requires a large portion of bandwidth for the data to reach you, which can hit issues along the way. Otherwise you aren’t losing much. If they're the same size, 1080p should be better, due to the much higher bitrate. I wouldn’t worry. When I previously researched this subject, I came across this 720p Ultra SirMaster. The chroma subsampling thing is important. Deep in the Heart of Texas. I will say where x265 shines over x264 is at very low bitrates. 2017. Honestly, it's hard to even begin to describe how good a disc this is. You can get the digital 4k (theatrical and directors cut) often for $5 - $10 on iTunes. Tigole - If You have a 40"+ Android TV or PC monitor, this re-encoder is the Shizz. It's the only reason I have my cutoffs at 4k HDR rather than a 1080 remux. The other file was ripped and then re-encoded with a lower bitrate to get a smaller file. I currently have about 3,600 Movies and nearly 600 TV Shows/Series. In the example you gave, I'm willing to bet the 60 GB file is a bluray remux. I have a pretty good sound system and it was completely wasted with streaming. It's WAY better on the 1080p release, which is 4k Web-dl vs 4k scene encode. They support resolutions up to 1080p and even 4K, depending on the disc . sharpie-man. And then I watched the same movie in 1080p x264 : Coco. 3 Mb/s. I have a 4K HDR OLED TV. Will dropping to 10 bit make a difference on a 1080p (/i) blu ray? My current set up is too old to trust comparison, and want to futureproof for new tv. much smaller file sizes compared to Remux. I've done some spot checks from the Windows version of I see so many people using remuxes and taking up 5x the disk space for something that at least to me doesn’t look too much better than a Blu-ray 1080p copy. In other words if I wanted to take that 22GB Blu-ray down to 1GB, x265 will look better than x264. It's 1080i 25 fps which means it's not actually interlaced. Depends on the disc and the streaming title, but I've seen plenty 1080p Blu-Ray looking better than 4K streaming. I'd take a 1080p Blu-ray over most 2160p Streaming. 7. UHD. Remux is the entire video file as it was encoded on the disk so there is no quality loss. To be honest, it's not worth it since most productions are running on 1080 or 1400. These staxrip/handbrake encoders don't fix the banding present in source I'm sure, they make it worse by bitstarving and using the same settings for everything. 1 audio where Netflix I think is using DD or DD+. Without knowing provenance or playback app/device/chain, it would at first make sense that the 4k might be better. 4K remux only for favourite movies. The extra data allows for a wider range of colors, more detail in the shadows and highlights, and Higher quality is higher quality . TrueHD. I, too, am just over 160TB now. 1. I'm going to assume that in this context, "webmux" is either some user's cute name/shorthand for their ripping/converting process, or the handle of the user/group. I'd like to get a better refinement of these particular… 2160P streaming from Prime at the full bitrate definitely looks better than 1080P Blu-Ray. Blu ray rencodes/scene rips are in the 6-15gb range give or take. Web-DL and Web rips fall in the 3-10gb+ range. Afterwards, I tried using x265 8/10/12 bit with various settings but overall results (size/quality) were always better The equal rate applies to the final video. Let your eyes be the judge. 1 Level, ref=5:bframes=5. 1. You could also go with 1080p blu ray as well. x265-WhiteRhino. With all the UHD Bluray Remux's that are starting to land (I think only 6 true remuxs now) I was changing up my quality settings so that the Bluray 1080p qualities range form 15GB-32GB and the 2160p are greater than that. HDR. Nolan himself says, that the Bluray released next week will be optimized best for home use. The Blutonium release of Captain Marvel was flawed. So while the name makes it sound like a 4k display has four times the amount of I go with x264 1080p at around 15-20GB per movie for everything (because you can very much see the difference on a good 4k screen), and an x265 4k version at around 20-30GB per movie for a specific subset (sci-fi, fantasy, etc that uses a lot of fx) using a second radarr. But keep in mind, it still looks noticeably worse than the source. For example, a 3180 x 2160 screen has four times the total pixels of a 1920 x 1080 display (8 million pixels You can get a 4tb internal hard drive fro about 70 bucks CAD nowadays, its really not that expensive. Or for repeat watches. Sure, but both audio/video bitrate is low (comression artefatcs). In other words, it was ripped directly from the bluray disc, bit for bit, so you're getting EXACTLY bluray quality. They are all 1080i 25 fps. i download 720p BluRay RARBG, seems to me the best ratio The 2160 copy is compressed. The better the resolution, the clearer and more detailed the picture will look. Now if you have a 4K TV, that's where the extra layers come in. At half the size too. They encode from BD Remux, so quality is good, plus, like your Chest hair, there's always extras included in the encode. Picture Quality. That cannot be true if the 2160p copy is smaller than the 1080p file. • 3 yr. Look up any European/British show bluray. Blu-Ray plays video at 1080p (HD) resolution. Blu-ray/remux will be in 20gb+ (the best you can get) BD Rip's are garbage and are in the 800mb-1gb range. Download One Piece (Season 1) Multi Audio [Hindi-English-Japanese-Tamil-Telugu] Web Series 480p | 720p | 1080p WEB-DL ESub upvote r/breakingbadmemes Even a regular blu-ray will look better than 4K streaming. a complete 1to1 ripped from a BluRay that hasn't been Videos that were recorded natively in 4K can have higher bitrates than 1080p videos from 1080p sources. For my remote users if transcoded is needed it’s done via a P2200. If it's a web rip the resolution will be the same, but bitrate will be lower (not a huge difference in quality, but noticeable). The 1080p is for remote streaming and sharing with family. Ibcap. Web-dl are also encoded which you can make out that don't have black strips. The thing I wonder about rarbgs bluray encodes is whether they're encoded from a bluray/remux or an already encoded source. REMUX is exact bluray quality. If you do your own high-quality encodings, I have found that you can shrink both 1080p BluRay and 4K BluRay down to about half their Remux size (on average) without any visual quality loss. I very much hope that one day there will be a flawless remastered version. most releases are WEB H265. And trust me, higher refresh rate is much better than higher resolution for any kind of gaming. Also there's a streaming aspect to all this and I guess Fandango has exclusive deal with IMAX. I would say from least quality to best is HDTV > WEB-DL > Blu-Ray. Look for hybrids. well, web-rip is just a screencapture of the web-dl. I can't say which source it is per the rules but recently I found the amazon web-dl of the show was far better than the bluray-remux. REMUX. Each season streaming from Prime in 4K takes around 180GB (~41mbps) of bandwidth and that is more raw data than 3 double layer Blu-Ray discs at full capacity and Blu-Ray uses pretty much the same video compression methods as Prime streaming. Probably influences the files people rip. 976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4. Reply reply A good 4K stream is about equivalent to a pretty good blu ray generally. Web-dl/webrip are transcoded from streaming sites. When it's only 1080p on disc, but 4K on streaming. There are outliers tho. qs bi zu ur fr oi dx og co xa